CRE Concentration Ratio Calculator
Measure both supervisory criteria from the 2006 interagency CRE concentration guidance in one place. Enter your construction and land development balances, multifamily balances, non-owner-occupied nonfarm nonresidential balances, Tier 1 capital, and ACL — the calculator returns the 100% CLD ratio, the 300% total CRE ratio, headroom in dollars and percentage points, and the 36-month growth flag examiners look at next.
Inputs
Use call-report definitions. Owner-occupied nonfarm nonresidential is excluded from the 300% test — keep those balances out of the third row.
Denominator = Tier 1 capital + ACL for loans, per the agencies' March 2020 alignment.
Inside the supervisory criterion but close. Board policy sub-limits typically trigger here.
Moderate total CRE concentration. Most community banks operate in this range.
Criterion #2 pairs the 300% concentration with 50%+ growth over the prior 36 months. Both prongs together drive the heaviest exam focus.
Educational tool. Not regulatory interpretation, legal advice, or a substitute for examiner analysis. Final loan classification follows Call Report Schedule RC-C instructions and supervisory judgment.
Definitions
What the two CRE concentration ratios actually measure
The interagency guidance issued December 12, 2006 — OCC Bulletin 2006-46 and FDIC FIL-104-2006 — named two supervisory criteria for identifying banks with significant CRE concentration risk. Both are still in force, reaffirmed in the 2015 interagency statement and again in the FDIC's December 2023 letter.
CLD ratio = (construction + land development + other land) ÷ (Tier 1 + ACL). Criterion #1 flags banks where this ratio is at or above 100%. CLD is the sharpest end of CRE — speculative inventory, no operating cash flow, repayment dependent on lease-up or sale at completion.
Total CRE ratio = (CLD + multifamily + non-owner-occupied nonfarm nonresidential) ÷ (Tier 1 + ACL). Criterion #2 has two prongs: the ratio at or above 300% and the CRE portfolio grown 50% or more in the prior 36 months. A bank can meet the concentration prong without the growth prong, but examiners weight both.
Owner-occupied CRE sits outside the 300% test. The carve-out is defined by source of repayment: if the borrower or an affiliate occupies the property and the primary repayment source is operating cash flow from the business that occupies it, the loan is owner-occupied. That is a credit risk closer to C&I than to investor CRE, and the agencies treat it accordingly.
The denominator changed in March 2020. The 2006 guidance used "total capital" (Tier 1 + Tier 2). Effective March 31, 2020 the agencies aligned the credit-concentration denominator at Tier 1 capital plus the ACL attributed to loans and leases. Same thresholds, different — and slightly tighter — denominator.
Exam Practice
Crossing a threshold is the entry point, not the conclusion
The 2006 guidance is explicit that the 100% and 300% numbers are supervisory criteria for additional scrutiny, not regulatory limits and not a safe harbor. Once a bank trips either threshold, examiners look at the seven risk-management practices the guidance names.
Board & management oversight
Documented CRE strategy, board-approved concentration sub-limits by property type and geography, periodic reporting to the board on actual vs. policy.
Portfolio management
Diversification across property type, geography, sponsor, and loan structure. Concentration sub-limits enforced and exception-tracked.
Management information systems
Timely portfolio-level reporting on concentration, vintage, sector, and watch-list. Monthly minimum, integrated with the loan accounting system.
Market analysis
Vacancy, absorption, rent, and cap rate trends by submarket. Stress scenarios tied to specific markets where the bank is concentrated.
Credit underwriting standards
Written policy on DSCR, LTV, debt yield, interest-only periods, amortization, and recourse. The 2015 statement called out drift on each of these as a concern.
Portfolio stress testing
Sensitivity analysis on NOI declines, cap rate expansion, and refinance risk. Results tie to capital adequacy and loan loss provisioning.
Credit risk review
Independent loan review with sample sizes scaled to concentration. Risk-rating accuracy, policy exception trends, and emerging weaknesses surfaced quarterly.
Worked Example
A $750M community bank approaching both thresholds
Assume a community bank with Tier 1 capital of $48M and ACL of $2M, putting the supervisory denominator at $50M. The bank's CRE book is $120M total — $45M of construction and land development, $35M of stabilized multifamily, and $40M of non-owner-occupied retail and office. Total CRE 36 months ago was $70M.
CLD ratio = $45M ÷ $50M = 90%. Below the 100% criterion. Headroom is 10 percentage points, or $5M of additional CLD capacity before tripping criterion #1.
Total CRE ratio = $120M ÷ $50M = 240%. Below the 300% concentration prong of criterion #2 with $30M of dollar headroom. But the 36-month growth check — ($120M − $70M) ÷ $70M = 71% — already clears the 50% growth threshold.
The bank does not meet criterion #2 today (both prongs must be true), but the trajectory is the story examiners will tell. Two more years of the same origination pace puts total CRE at $200M against a roughly flat denominator — 400% concentration with continued 50%+ growth. The right ALCO action is now: tighten CLD pricing, build a participation pipeline for larger non-owner-occupied deals, and submit a revised concentration policy to the board with sub-limits by property type before the next exam.
Questions & Answers
CRE concentration — frequently asked questions
What is the CRE concentration ratio?
The CRE concentration ratio is the dollar value of a bank's commercial real estate exposure divided by its capital base. Bank examiners use two of them: construction, land development, and other land (CLD) loans divided by Tier 1 capital plus the ACL, and total CRE loans (CLD plus multifamily and nonfarm nonresidential, excluding owner-occupied) divided by the same denominator. The supervisory criteria from the 2006 interagency guidance are 100 percent for the CLD ratio and 300 percent for the total CRE ratio, paired with 50 percent or more growth in the CRE portfolio over the prior 36 months.
What counts as CRE for the 300% supervisory criterion?
Construction, land development, and other land loans; loans secured by multifamily residential property; and loans secured by nonfarm nonresidential property — excluding loans secured by owner-occupied nonfarm nonresidential properties. Owner-occupied is defined by source of repayment, not loan size: if the primary repayment source is the cash flow from operations of the owner or affiliate that occupies the property, the loan is owner-occupied and sits outside the 300 percent test.
Are the 100% and 300% thresholds hard regulatory limits?
No. The 2006 interagency guidance and every reaffirmation since are explicit that the thresholds are supervisory criteria for additional scrutiny, not regulatory limits or a safe harbor. A bank under the thresholds can still receive enhanced review if portfolio composition, underwriting trends, or market conditions warrant it. A bank above the thresholds with strong risk management, capital, and stress testing is not automatically cited.
What is the denominator examiners use today?
Tier 1 capital plus the allowance for credit losses (ACL) attributed to loans and leases. The original 2006 guidance referenced 'total capital,' but effective March 31, 2020 the federal banking agencies aligned the denominator for credit-concentration measurement at Tier 1 plus ACL, reflecting the move to CECL and the desire for a more loss-absorbing capital base in the calculation.
How do examiners use this number in practice?
The ratio is the entry point, not the conclusion. Examiners pair it with growth rate, sector mix, geographic mix, sponsor concentration, and the seven risk-management practices the 2006 guidance names — board oversight, portfolio management, MIS, market analysis, underwriting standards, stress testing, and credit risk review. A bank running at 350 percent with strong stress testing and a stable portfolio is treated differently from a bank at 220 percent that grew 60 percent in three years on speculative construction.
How can a bank manage CRE concentration?
The levers are raising capital, slowing originations, selling participations, increasing the share of owner-occupied CRE (which sits outside the 300 percent test), or letting the portfolio run off. Most community banks use a combination — pricing discipline on new CLD originations, a participation pipeline for larger deals, and a board-approved sub-limit by property type. The 2015 interagency statement called out interest-only periods, longer amortization, and less restrictive covenants as the underwriting drift examiners watch for when concentration is high.
What is the 36-month growth test?
Criterion #2 in the 2006 guidance has two parts, not one. A bank meets it when total CRE is at or above 300 percent of Tier 1 plus ACL and the CRE portfolio has grown 50 percent or more over the prior 36 months. Banks that have run high concentrations for years without growth are weighted differently from banks that crossed the threshold recently on rapid origination.
Is this calculator a substitute for examiner analysis?
No. This is a planning and policy-monitoring tool. Final classification of any loan as CRE, CLD, or owner-occupied for supervisory purposes follows Call Report Schedule RC-C instructions and examiner judgment. Use the ratio to track headroom against your board-approved policy and to flag when the portfolio is heading into territory the next exam will focus on.
How often should a bank measure CRE concentration?
Monthly at the minimum, quarterly with formal reporting to ALCO and the board, and on every new large CRE commitment before approval. The 2015 interagency statement made clear that growth velocity matters as much as the absolute number — a bank cannot wait for the call report to discover it has crossed a board-approved sub-limit.
Related
Related calculators & resources
How Aloan spreads rent rolls, computes NOI and debt yield, and builds the underwriting file.
How current guidance treats AI in underwriting and what examiners are looking for.
Property-level cap rate, debt yield, and LTV for CRE deals.
Debt service coverage with rate and NOI stress scenarios.
Track distance to covenant breach across DSCR, leverage, and debt yield.
Source-cited reference for automating spreading, GCF, and credit memos.
Aloan handles the CRE underwriting under the concentration line
Rent roll spreading, NOI normalization, DSCR and debt yield stress, source-cited credit memos. Consistent per-deal analysis under the concentration line — the file work the next exam reads.